Ethics and boundaries
Ethics statement
Journalist safety protects people so they can report and the public can stay informed.
We take a do no harm approach. Training should reduce risk, not create false confidence.
We design for local reality. Safety work should respect universal rights and the culture people are reporting in. Copy and paste solutions can backfire.
We build through dialogue. We involve journalists, editors, media leaders, and community stakeholders so plans reflect real constraints and local knowledge.
We avoid taking control. If we are not the long term holder of local expertise, we build for handoff. We plan for independence from the start.
We protect confidentiality. We collect as little data as possible, limit access to need to know, and treat safety plans and incident details as sensitive.
We measure what we can, with care. We use lightweight evaluation beyond satisfaction, since impact is hard to track and easy to misread.
Client boundary policy
What we do
- Provide journalist safety planning tools, training, and coaching
- Help you build duty of care routines and editorial risk review
- Support trauma aware practices for difficult coverage
- Provide de-escalation scripts and disengagement thresholds for common field and online conflict situations
- Offer practical digital security readiness steps
- Provide online harassment response planning, newsroom protocols, and manager scripts
What we do not do
- Guarantee safety or outcomes
- Replace emergency services, medical providers, legal counsel, or law enforcement
- Direct real time decisions during an active incident unless explicitly contracted and feasible
- Store highly sensitive information unless essential, with clear retention and deletion rules
When we pause or stop work
- If the requested work is likely to increase risk through overconfidence
- If we lack local context and cannot identify an appropriate local partner for co design
- If confidentiality cannot be reasonably protected